Mircea Badea este tot mai îngrijorat de propria siguranţă şi de aceea a arătat în direct arma pe care o posedă cu permis.
Video:

Realizatorul “În gura presei” crede că lucrurile vor degenera în România şi se va ajunge ca în Brazilia acolo unde oamenii sunt ameninţaţi cu arma pentru a fi jefuiţi.

Badea este în dezacord cu persoanele care se emoţionează mult prea repede atunci când vine vorba de purtarea unei arme.

Vedeta Antena 3 mărturiseşte că, în orice moment, poate fi atacat de un nebun sau de o persoană plătită să îi facă rău şi, de aceea, a hotărât să îşi procure armă pentru autoapărare.

“Nu vreau să fiu atacat de un nebun, de un dement sau de o persoană plătită să îmi facă rău. Sau poate vrea vreunul să se ia de iubita mea. Arma este pentru autoapărare. Cred că în România, lucrurile vor fi ca în Brazilia, unde oameni vor fi ameninţaţi cu arma pe stradă ca să fie jefuiţi. De aceea prefer să mă protejez de astfel de incidente neplăcute”, a spus Mircea Badea, la “În gura presei”

Sursa: Cancan.ro

Mircea are dreptate cu atat mai mult cu cat daca ne gandim la cazul lui vb de o persoana publica care mai mult ca sigur a starnit si destule antipatii de aceea chiar sustin cele spuse de el.Intr-o societate civilizata este o datorie sa ai mijloacele sa te APERI pe tine si familia ta in fata unor amenintari.

Administraţiile locale au obligaţia să reducă cheltuielile şi să dea afară mii de oameni. Au însă în vedere şi alte lucruri. Jumătate de milion de lei pe cartele pentru raţionalizarea hranei în caz de război. Atât au alocat consilierii judeţeni din Braşov.

Reprezentanţii Consiliului Judeţean Braşov au alocat, în şedinţa de vineri, 554.000 de lei pentru tipărirea a 4,5 milioane de cartele de consum.

Consilierii spun că aceşti bani vor fi cheltuiţi doar în cazul în care în România va fi declarată stare de necesitate sau stare de război. Atunci, ele vor fi tipărite şi distribuite populaţiei. Cartelele vor fi folosite pentru a cumpăra produse alimentare şi nealimentare în mod raţionalizat.

Reprezentanţii Consiliului Judeţean spun că această procedură este una standard şi se face pe baza unui ordin dat în 2003, de către Oficiul Central de Stat pentru Probleme Speciale.

Sursa : Realitatea.Net

Poate acum aflam raspunsul la intrebarea pe care am lansat-o eu public aici.

A dark object may be lurking near our solar system, occasionally kicking comets in our direction.

Nicknamed “Nemesis” or “The Death Star,” this undetected object could be a red or brown dwarf star, or an even darker presence several times the mass of Jupiter.

Why do scientists think something could be hidden beyond the edge of our solar system? Originally, Nemesis was suggested as a way to explain a cycle of mass extinctions on Earth.

The paleontologists David Raup and Jack Sepkoski claim that, over the last 250 million years, life on Earth has faced extinction in a 26-million-year cycle. Astronomers proposed comet impacts as a possible cause for these catastrophes.

Our solar system is surrounded by a vast collection of icy bodies called the Oort Cloud. If our Sun were part of a binary system in which two gravitationally-bound stars orbit a common center of mass, this interaction could disturb the Oort Cloud on a periodic basis, sending comets whizzing towards us.

An asteroid impact is famously responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago, but large comet impacts may be equally deadly. A comet may have been the cause of the Tunguska event in Russia in 1908. That explosion had about a thousand times the power of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, and it flattened an estimated 80 million trees over an 830 square mile area.

While there’s little doubt about the destructive power of cosmic impacts, there is no evidence that comets have periodically caused mass extinctions on our planet. The theory of periodic extinctions itself is still debated, with many insisting that more proof is needed. Even if the scientific consensus is that extinction events don’t occur in a predictable cycle, there are now other reasons to suspect a dark companion to the Sun.

The Footprint of Nemesis

A recently-discovered dwarf planet, named Sedna, has an extra-long and usual elliptical orbit around the Sun. Sedna is one of the most distant objects yet observed, with an orbit ranging between 76 and 975 AU (where 1 AU is the distance between the Earth and the Sun). Sedna’s orbit is estimated to last between 10.5 to 12 thousand years. Sedna’s discoverer, Mike Brown of Caltech, noted in a Discover magazine article that Sedna’s location doesn’t make sense.

“Sedna shouldn’t be there,” said Brown. “There’s no way to put Sedna where it is. It never comes close enough to be affected by the Sun, but it never goes far enough away from the Sun to be affected by other stars.”

Perhaps a massive unseen object is responsible for Sedna’s mystifying orbit, its gravitational influence keeping Sedna fixed in that far-distant portion of space.

“My surveys have always looked for objects closer and thus moving faster,” Brown said to Astrobiology Magazine. “I would have easily overlooked something so distant and slow moving as Nemesis.”

John Matese, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, suspects Nemesis exists for another reason. The comets in the inner solar system seem to mostly come from the same region of the Oort Cloud, and Matese thinks the gravitational influence of a solar companion is disrupting that part of the cloud, scattering comets in its wake. His calculations suggest Nemesis is between 3 to 5 times the mass of Jupiter, rather than the 13 Jupiter masses or greater that some scientists think is a necessary quality of a brown dwarf. Even at this smaller mass, however, many astronomers would still classify it as a low mass star rather than a planet, since the circumstances of birth for stars and planets differ.

The Oort Cloud is thought to extend about 1 light year from the Sun. Matese estimates Nemesis is 25,000 AU away (or about one-third of a light year). The next-closest known star to the Sun is Proxima Centauri, located 4.2 light years away.

Richard Muller of the University of California Berkeley first suggested the Nemesis theory, and even wrote a popular science book on the topic. In his view, Nemesis is a red dwarf star 1.5 light years away. Many scientists counter that such a wide orbit is inherently unstable and could not have lasted long — certainly not long enough to have caused the extinctions seen in Earth’s fossil record. But Muller says this instability has resulted in an orbit that has changed greatly over billions of years, and in the next billion years Nemesis will be thrown free of the solar system.

Binary star systems are common in the galaxy. It is estimated that one-third of the stars in the Milky Way are either binary or part of a multiple-star system.

Red dwarfs are also common — in fact, astronomers say they are the most common type of star in the galaxy. Brown dwarfs are also thought to be common, but there are only a few hundred known at this time because they are so difficult to see. Red and brown dwarfs are smaller and cooler than our Sun, and do not shine brightly. If red dwarfs can be compared to the red embers of a dying fire, then brown dwarfs would be the smoldering ash. Because they are so dim, it is plausible that the Sun could have a secret companion even though we’ve searched the sky for many years with a variety of instruments.

NASA’s newest telescope, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), may be able to answer the question about Nemesis once and for all.
Finding Dwarfs in the Dark

WISE looks at our universe in the infrared part of the spectrum. Like the Spitzer Space telescope, WISE is hunting for heat. The difference is that WISE has a much wider field of view, and so is able to scan a greater portion of the sky for distant objects.

WISE began scanning the sky on January 14, and NASA recently released the mission’s first images. The mission will map the entire sky until October, when the spacecraft’s coolant runs out.

Part of the WISE mission is to search for brown dwarfs, and NASA expects it could find one thousand of the dim stellar objects within 25 light years of our solar system.

Davy Kirkpatrick at NASA’s Infrared Processing and Analysis Center at Caltech found nothing when he searched for Nemesis using data from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Now Kirkpatrick is part of the WISE science team, ready to search again for any signs of a companion to our Sun.

Kirkpatrick doesn’t think Nemesis will be the red dwarf star with an enormous orbit described by Muller. In his view, Matese’s description of Nemesis as a low mass object closer to home is more plausible.

“I think the possibility that the Sun could harbor a companion of another sort is not a crazy idea,” said Kirkpatrick. “There might be a distant object in a more stable, more circular orbit that has gone unnoticed so far.”

Ned Wright, professor of astronomy and physics at UCLA and the principle investigator for the WISE mission said that WISE will easily see an object with a mass a few times that of Jupiter and located 25,000 AU away, as suggested by Matese.

“This is because Jupiter is self-luminous like a brown dwarf,” said Wright. “But for planets less massive than Jupiter in the far outer solar system, WISE will be less sensitive.”

Neither Kirkpatrick nor Wright think Nemesis is disrupting the Oort cloud and sending comets towards Earth, however. Because they envision a more benign orbit, they prefer the name “Tyche” (the good sister).

Regardless of what they expect to find, the WISE search won’t focus on one particular region of the sky.

“The great thing about WISE, as was also true of 2MASS, is that it’s an all-sky survey,” said Kirkpatrick. “There will be some regions such as the Galactic Plane where the observations are less sensitive or fields more crowded, but we’ll search those areas too. So we’re not preferentially targeting certain directions.”

We may not have an answer to the Nemesis question until mid-2013. WISE needs to scan the sky twice in order to generate the time-lapsed images astronomers use to detect objects in the outer solar system. The change in location of an object between the time of the first scan and the second tells astronomers about the object’s location and orbit.

“I don’t suspect we’ll have completed the search for candidate objects until mid-2012, and then we may need up to a year of time to complete telescopic follow-up of those objects,” said Kirkpatrick.

Even if Nemesis is not found, the WISE telescope will help shed light on the darkest corners of the solar system. The telescope can be used to search for dwarf planets like Pluto that orbit the Sun off the solar system’s ecliptic plane. The objects that make up the Oort Cloud are too small and far away for WISE to see, but it will be able to track potentially dangerous comets and asteroids closer to home.

Sursa: Space.com

Also visit : Breaking NEWS Nibiru is HERE!

Video:

Video:

Lipsit de coerenta si viziune in administrarea deficitului, guvernul stie doar sa impoziteze munca

Pentru un salariu brut de 1.000 de lei, statul incaseaza atat de la angajat, cat si de la angajator 573,6 lei. Ceea ce inseamna 81,8% din valoarea salariului net aferent acestui exemplu. Zicem, deci, supraimpozitare. Paradoxal insa, ponderea veniturilor bugetare in PIB se plaseaza in medie la 30%. Cu alte cuvinte, fiscalitatea ar parea foarte scazuta. In realitate, guvernul, lipsit de coerenta si viziune in administrarea deficitului, nu stie decat sa impoziteze munca. Cea a oamenilor de rand.

In ultimii 10 ani, bugetul statului nu a reusit sa-si creasca veniturile la mai mult de 28%-32% din PIB. La prima vedere, orice observator strain ar crede ca acest lucru este determinat de o fiscalitate scazuta. In realitate insa, si putinul care alimenteaza „pusculita statului” este strans din supraimpozitarea firmelor. Iar pentru a demonstra acest lucru, este suficient calculul care arata ca peste 80% din salariul net al unui angajat este incasat de stat sub forma impozitelor si a contributiilor sociale.

Pentru un salariu brut de 1.000 de lei statul incaseaza din contributiile suportate atat de angajat, cat si de angajator nu mai putin de 573,6 lei. Astfel, salariatul are de achitat pentru inceput cota de 16,5% reprezentand CAS, care inseamna, pentru venitul salarial luat drept exemplu, 135 de lei. Dupa scaderea acestui impozit din salariul brut, angajatului ii raman 835 de lei, la care se aplica 16%, cota unica. In aceste conditii, salariul net ajunge la 701,4 lei.

Pe de alta parte, pentru salariul brut de 1.000 de lei, angajatorul, la randul sau, are obligatia sa plateasca statului o contributie sociala de 27,5%. Ca atare, daca adunam toate taxele platite pentru acest salariu brut rezulta un total de 573,6 lei, care are o pondere de 81,8% in valoarea salariului net incasat de un om al muncii (de rand).

Pamantul, un activ neimpozitat

Este mult? Se pare ca da, in conditiile in care, referindu-se la acest 81,8%, chiar guvernatorul BNR, Mugur Isarescu, a atras atentia ca firmele sunt supraimpozitate. Totodata, seful bancii centrale a aratat ca prin aplicarea acestei strategii si in continuare, adica din a se concentra tot pe taxarea muncii, guvernul se va confrunta in final cu un efect advers. „Marirea contributiilor sociale ar putea mari deficitul bugetului asigurarilor sociale, adica ar micsora veniturile”, a spus guvernatorul BNR, in cadrul dezbaterii „Romania 2010: constrangerile economico-financiare si imperativele so­ciale“, organizata de Banca Nationala in colaborare cu publicatiile „Financiarul” si „Saptamana Financiara”.

Acesta a pledat pentru gasirea, in viitor, a unor solu­tii care sa nu descurajeze munca, asa cum se intampla astazi in Romania, din cauza sistemului sau fiscal. Seful bancii centrale a explicat ca, in functie de politica bugetara adoptata, se pot stimula munca, rigoarea in cheltuirea banului, si nu numai public, dar si privat, eficienta, productivitatea. Iar in opinia sa iesirea din recesiune se poate face doar prin aplicarea unor constrangeri bugetare tari, aratand ca absenta acestora duce la relaxare si o inclinatie spre protectia sociala. „Mi-aduc aminte ca in anii ‘90-’91 constrangerile bugetare tari erau un termen central in ceea ce priveste programele de redresare economica. Pare paradoxal, constrangerile bugetare tari, acelea ajuta economia“, a afirmat Mugur Isarescu.

Acesta a reiterat faptul ca exista inca multe zone din economie ramase netaxate. „Nu este impozitat, de exemplu, principalul activ al tarii, pamantul.

Am incercat sa introduc eu acest impozit in 2000, dar mi-au sarit toate partidele in cap, pentru ca era an electoral. Nu s-a putut nici in anul urmator, nici dupa doi ani, si nici dupa aceea, pentru ca urmau iar alegeri”, a aratat Mugur Isarescu.

Pondere mare in PIB a cheltuielii publice

Si economistul-sef al BNR, Valentin Lazea, a subliniat ca desi nivelul CAS din Romania, de 43%, este mai mare decat media europeana, de 39%, fondurile colectate de stat nu sunt suficiente pentru pensii, sanatate sau alte cheltuieli. „Banii nu ajung, poate ca unii nu platesc, a punctat acesta.

Economistul-sef al bancii centrale a mai explicat ca nivelul mai mic de CAS din Europa este completat de servicii de pensii si sanatate oferite in sistem privat. Din punctul sau de vedere, introducerea unei cote progresive de impozitare nu va duce la o crestere a veniturilor bugetare. In opinia sa, aceasta solutie este „exclusa din start“, intr-un mediu in care „nu exista apetenta si putinta” pentru asa ceva, iar oamenii bogati nu sunt dispusi sa ii sprijine pe ceilalti, care stau si asteapta serviciile sociale. „Eu doar constat. Nu spun ca este bine sau rau sa inlocuim cota unica prin impozitarea progresiva”, a conchis acesta, precizand ca un sistem de solidaritate sociala nu functioneaza in Romania.

De altfel, nivelul cheltuielilor publice cu pensiile, salariile si alte ajutoare sociale a atins 60% din PIB, cu mult mai mare decat in alte state dezvoltate.

Spre exemplu, in Danemarca ponderea este de 50,15 din PIB, in Marea Britanie de 51,7% din PIB, iar in Franta de 56% din PIB.

Sursa: Financiarul.com